Friday, September 19, 2008

Haters still be hatin’

This charming image was just posted at the pro-Hillary blog HillBuzz.

HillBuzz is run by a self-described group of “mostly over-educated, 30-something, urban, white, gay men living in Chicago.”

To them I say: Save those “golden showers” for your weekend get- togethers, girls. Same goes for the sex-trained dogs.


Anonymous said...

They must have a lot of time on their freaky hands to photo shop this nonsense.

Anonymous said...

Calling gay men "girls" is really offensive. You should know better to perpetuate stereotypes and prejudice.

odocoileus said...

Calling gay men "girls" is really offensive. You should know better to perpetuate stereotypes and prejudice.

What would you prefer?

Ass pirate? Rump ranger? Pole vaulter?

Anonymous said...

Hilarious. I'm not a gay man, I'm a woman, but really, that is just so ignorant.

odocoileus said...

Hilarious. I'm not a gay man, I'm a woman, but really, that is just so ignorant.

Boo hoo hoo.

(What are you wearing?)

Undercover Black Man said...

Odo, what's gotten into you?

Invisible Woman said...

What's gotten into everybody? Freakin hilarious tho!

odocoileus said...

Frustration with moony anus' rank hypocrisy.

Although, I dare say your original post was rougher than any of my comments.

sex-trained dogs?!


Unknown said...


David, you are losing your sanity.

Anonymous said...

I am as politically incorrect as you get, but I really do not find this discussion "hilarious", I find it really depressing. Advocating for one oppressed group while ridiculing another?

Anonymous said...

What is wrong with "girls", anonymous?

Is there something about being effeminate (I prefer "sensitive") that disgusts you?

My friends and I refer to each other as "girls" when we are feeling girlish.

You need to look deep inside and examine the self-hating attitudes.

Anonymous said...

You know darn well what is wrong with calling men "girls" in this gay (and women)-hating homophobic society. A lot different calling one's own friends in jest, versus taunting a minority group in a ridiculing way.
Why don't you discuss this with the 1 in 3 gay youths who attempt suicide because of attitudes like this.

Anonymous said...

It’s interesting that the homosexuals and their supporters jumped all over Mr. Mills for describing homosexuals as girls, but not one of them condemned the website that posted the picture
of the dog pissing on the Obama sign.

Then again there’s really nothing unusual about white homosexuals being white nationalists and
harboring white supremacists views. J. Edgar Hoover proved that.

However neither “mostly over-educated, 30-something, urban, white, gay men” nor psychopaths like Bill White are Barack Obama’s primary problem in this election.

Poll: Racial views steer some white Dems away from Obama

[Deep-seated racial misgivings could cost Barack Obama the White House if the election is close, according to an AP-Yahoo News poll that found one-third of white Democrats harbor negative views toward blacks — many calling them "lazy," "violent," responsible for their own troubles.

The poll, conducted with Stanford University, suggests that the percentage of voters who may turn away from Obama because of his race could easily be larger than the final difference between the candidates in 2004 — about two and one-half percentage points.

The pollsters set out to determine why Obama is locked in a close race with McCain even as the political landscape seems to favor Democrats. President Bush's unpopularity, the Iraq war and a national sense of economic hard times cut against GOP candidates, as does that fact that Democratic voters outnumber Republicans.

The findings suggest that Obama's problem is close to home — among his fellow Democrats, particularly non-Hispanic white voters. Just seven in 10 people who call themselves Democrats support Obama, compared to the 85 percent of self-identified Republicans who back McCain.

Researchers used mathematical modeling to sort out the relative impact of a huge swath of variables that might have an impact on people's votes — including race, ideology, party identification, the hunger for change and the sentiments of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's backers.

Just 59 percent of her white Democratic supporters said they wanted Obama to be president.

Nearly 17 percent of Clinton's white backers plan to vote for McCain.

Among white Democrats, Clinton supporters were nearly twice as likely as Obama backers to say at least one negative adjective described blacks well, a finding that suggests many of her supporters in the primaries — particularly whites with high school education or less — were motivated in part by racial attitudes.

This is precisely why I thought that is was absolutely absurd and unjust for Obama to pander to the white nationalist vote by endorsing Bush-Dog Democrat John Barrow over progressive Afrikan American Regina Thomas in a Georgia primary.

As Michael Fisher said, white people know when they getting their genitals licked. They’ll enjoy every minute of the licking, and pull the lever for McCain when its time to get down to business.

Barack Obama has been poorly advised on racial matters during this election cycle.

Anonymous said...

[Below previously posted at, as noted. A.]

Obama Isn't Serious: Manchurian Only Real Possibility, Everything Considered For Criminal Conspiratorial Deconstruction Of USA
(Apollonian, 19 Aug 08)

Thanks much to "Gage" (see, "Secret Service...," 16 Aug 08) above, who courageously broaches the election issue by which pretext I submit following analysis:

(1) First note the "elections" are ABSOLUTELY, TOTALLY fixed and rigged by ZOG-Mammon (see we know quite well not only who WILL win (the fixed/rigged "election"), but also who would be favored to win in all logic. Once circumstances are fully understood, this "election" issue is simple "no-brainer."

(2) And observe Bill White (ANSWP and, "Bill White's Speech," 30 July 08) has also previously analyzed things political btwn communists behind UN and CFR-Bilderberg (pretended "left"), and Israeli Zionists (pretended "right").

(3) Consider Obama--a total negroid joke, complete with fat lips and flappy ears. Yes, Obama has good speaking voice, and he's excellent actor, but never doubt he necessarily and must follow a most carefully scripted text and formula.

(4) Further, Obama needs lots of that Jew hype and Hollywood-style glitz and sand-bag glamorization, and oodles and boodles of huge tremendous funding and financing. Obama is mere card-board front, crass and classic "spokes-flack"--and nothing more--otherwise he's really quite weak as "Christian" author, Jerome Corsi ("Obama Nation," currently on top of best-seller list), matter-of-factly pt.s out.

So who actually would vote for or support Obama?--absolutely no one but young and dumb people, THAT'S ALL--queers, certainly. Even middle-age negroids surely understand the sham and scam of it all. Obama wouldn't even win a genuine election among his own black folks--as he's not nearly nigger-radical enough, say, like Al Sharpton, a real, genuine coon, a nigger's nigger.

(5) Now look at the "Manchurian candidate," McCain, a genuine, bona fide traitor, totally and thoroughly compromised, known by fellow ex-P.O.W.s as "Songbird"--a piece-of-shit who's father was a traitor, who covered-up the USS Liberty affair (see for Israel fm back in 1967. There couldn't be more perfect, tried and tested "Shabbat-goy" than the Manchurian.

(6) Observe further to whom Manchurian candidate is literally married to--noneother than ROYALTY, fm topmost criminal Jew families of USA, Hensley, closely connected to noneother than Bronfmans who control CBS, I understand (see, "Who Rules America?").

(7) Hence comrade "Gage," I hope u can now begin to see it is absolutely INCONCEIVABLE there will be any other pres.-elect than our dear Manchurian. Obama does however well play a distinct role, unquestionably (see below).

(8) Further, note the old Manchurian bastard is now past 70 yrs, and it's quite possible he'll have a kike as his running-mate. So when the piece-of-shit bites the dust, we'll have a real-live kike running things fm the top position.

(9) When u look at things in full context, u'll see Obama the negroid is simply playing a role--much like Kerry did in 2004--the designated loser who will quietly go along, for that's his real purpose, to fill-out this filthy, stinking little Jew melodramatic by which the goyim are led down the "primrose path."

CONCLUSION: Thanks again to "Gage" who provides dialectic opportunity to present above analysis. The more one seriously considers, the more obvious it becomes how Jews are scripting and intend to manage things. Obama winning, everything considered, just couldn't work nearly as well otherwise, and could not be serious, esp. considering alternatives within full circumstances. However, Obama DOES indeed have his uses, and is good excuse, for example, to get queers and "liberal" shit-for-brains behind using him as pretext to harass ANSWP and white patriots. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

Anonymous said...

The problem with UBM's post is not that it's not PC but that it's unfunny. Gays are the easiest group to make fun of, yet all you could come up with is that. Pathetic.

Undercover Black Man said...

... yet all you could come up with is that.

It's called "comedy jiu jitsu," my friend. That's where you turn the target's own words and images against him.

In this case, they provided the pee, and they provided the dog. And they proudly proclaim themselves gay men.