Seems like Lawrence Auster, that inexhaustible blogger of the ultra-right, has finally returned to the business of saving white civilization… and stopped obsessing about Undercover Black Man.
For one wild week, though, UBM was all up inside Larry’s head. Herewith, some choice bits from Auster’s blog:
May 14: “[W]as UBM’s rage against me triggered, not by my treating him with some supposed racist indifference or contempt, but by my treating him respectfully, as a person capable of rational discussion – a respect which, as the discussion proceeded, became impossible to maintain?”
May 12: “Based on Undercover Black Man’s own words, [commenter] Conservative Swede offers an incisive analysis of the real racial hatred that drives UBM – a hatred of blacks. … [T]his is not just UBM’s own anti-black revulsion, as a self-hating partially black man…; it is the anti-black revulsion of liberals generally.”
“[H]e is barely black. … [M]aybe Mills should change his moniker from ‘Undercover Black Man’ to ‘Barely a Black.’ ”
May 11: “… Mills’s letter reveals him as an obvious character assassin.”
“So here’s what David Horowitz needs to do to get right with God and man: … apologize for having given the leftist hit artist David Mills a weapon with which to harm me…”
May 9: “[I]t is Mills and James Wolcott who have set the destructive tone. … [E]ach invests my simplest, most ordinary statements with fictional emotions and motivations designed to make me look base or ridiculous.”
May 7: “David Mills, the enemy to whom David Horowitz gave the gun to shoot him with, is triumphing again today at Huffington Post…”
“Horowitz, confronted by this obvious enemy, confided to the enemy that he found the enemy’s evidence persuasive that certain statements by me… were racist.” [Italics in the original.]
Meanwhile, I’ve been doing what Auster and Horowitz and all other white polemicists who play the rape card should be doing: trying to determine the truth about interracial rape in the United States.
I’ll share whatever I find.