So Ann Coulter is back with another book. And she’s all over the TV popping her usual shit, like how Michelle Obama is no Jackie Kennedy.
Made me wanna dust off this audio clip from 2007. (I swear, how does Coulter get away with saying such things?)
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
18 comments:
True, she's a detestably self-promoting provocateur (doubly redundant?) . . .
. . . who deserves none of the attention media bait-takers predictably swallow . . .
. . . but your too-clever typographic anagram in the head is distasteful, in my view, David.
Rise above, man. The high road is our friend.
Keep it real, sure, but keep it at least semi-clean. Even for a total biatch.
^ Your objection is noted, Alan.
I just posted about Ann too. I've been seeing her on the news non-stop and I don't understand why, especially since I don't know who's buying her books. I think so many liberals buy her books so they can denounce her, yet it adds to her sales. She can't be good for business cause she hurts my eyes and ears. I hated that her jaw wasn't still wired shut.
When she spoke with Matt Lauer yesterday she said something about Michelle Obama looking like Jackie O on Halloween, or some such shyte.
You know, I couldn't help but think she wanted to say "Jackie O in black face." But damn those Liberals and political correctness.
Anyway, she needs an exorcist.
Oh, and Matt called her out on referring to Obama as "B. Hussein Obama" throughout the book. He mentioned how she didn't refer to Bush as "G. Walker Bush."
please forgive me, i'm new to this person's insanity. is her reading in the first person or in the third person?
i wonder how many times she practiced not saying "in black face" so as not to slip into a joke, i am sure, was told at many conservative holiday party circles.
btw, i thought the dirty word scramble was imaginative. wrong, but imaginative. :)
is her reading in the first person or in the third person?
It's me cutting and pasting pieces from her last audiobook... basically substituting "Jews" for "liberals."
She's good for ratings, I suppose. She's a shock-jock - Howard Stern minus the salacity. We may not want to have a beer with people like her, but there's an attraction - and it's not physical.
I think it's best to simply ignore pugilists like Coulter and others, recognizing the fact that there is a bottomline to people like these.
They are "entertainers" who collect large sums of money for the "sleight-of-hand" shows they put on, which, apparently, unfortunately, many appreciate and are willing to pay for.
Given the way the last election went, dissing Michelle Obama will sell books.
Nice word scramble, Dave.
Hey, you didn't make the word scramble up. It's the letters in her name.
p.s. You are so bad! I would expect anything LESS from you :)
I believe in telling it like it is so the word scramble works for me. I have no problem with the word - if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...
I've come to the conclusion that she's a comedian... She's playing a character, just like Stephen Colbert... but she just stays in character all the time.
No way does she believe even half of the shit she says.
No way does she believe even half of the shit she says.
You
have no idea how much she doesn't believe it.
*wouldn't*
Ha... They gave her WAY too much hips and booty in that Boondocks episode!
Hey there,
Well Ann's strategy worked....she has managed to have her name AND book mentioned on more black blogs than she ever expected....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iM7MR5_v47w
^ Well done.
Post a Comment