Friday, December 5, 2008

Lawrence Auster has a question.

My favorite right-wing blogger posted this tonight:

“As I type, I’m glancing at some grotesque thing on ABC, about the Grinch and Christmas, in which humans interact in brotherhood with a variety of monstrous looking other species, and a little girl has a tender relationship with an unsettlingly hideous but sensitive and kind-hearted being called the Grinch, and everyone loves each other.

“This is not our society celebrating the beautiful holiday of Christmas, this is the Liberal Controllers of our society carefully teaching children an unnatural and dangerous lie that they would never believe unless they were carefully taught.

“How many whites will militate against vitally necessary immigration restrictions in the decades to come, how many young females will be raped and murdered by nonwhites in the decades to come, because of the message of trusting and loving racial aliens that programs like this implant in them?”

UPDATE (12/07/08): One of Lawrence Auster’s readers, Peter A., commented thusly:

“The ‘Shrek’ movies were an especially blatant case of promoting miscegenation and of emasculating white men.”

I believe he’s serious.

22 comments:

  1. Now, I just want to know. The Grinch is GREEN, FURRY,and NOT HUMAN. Now how does this crazy, right-wing blogger compare this to a non-white person? Oh, I get it. He's saying that if you are NOT white you are NOT HUMAN;he believes only white people are human. Isn't that funny. We were at least considered to be 3/5 of a human being just some years ago. Well, that's more than one half and better than what this crazy blogger is saying. He needs Jesus! Fo real, he do!

    ReplyDelete
  2. ^ Greetings, Profilicsis.

    Funny you should mention Jesus. My man Lawrence Auster is a devout Christian of the Anglican persuasion. I wonder what Jesus taught about "trusting and loving racial aliens"?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh man. That is good.

    You know, I'm not even going to follow the link, because I don't want to know shit more about that guy. That little gem is really just what it is. A crystallization of stupidity of the most magical kind.

    And besides - who's looking out for the white males huh!! Maybe we need to be protected from those hostile, horrible, hellacious "nonwhite" females.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The funny thing about Auster is the way he gets all sensitive and offended if other racists dare talk about Jews the way he talks about blacks/Hispanics/Muslims/etc.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This guy is really stretching -Good God,it's not that deep!

    It's a freakin' children's story, Lawrence obviously has way too much time on his hands.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I just wrote about this subject. (shameless self promotion)

    I find it fascinating when white people rail on about how minorities are allowed to have open displays of pride for their culture but whites have to disabuse themselves of the notion, lest they risk being labeled with the “R” word.

    White Pride is synonymous with racism. It’s a reactionary term that riles up the basest among us. It’s a national game of He-Has-It-I-Want-It, mixed with pure, unadulterated hatred of any non-white person

    The fact is, we honkies are at the top of the power structure. Despite Obama’s win, Whities still control most of America and probably will for a good number of years to come.

    And if this guy's intelligence is any indication, the supremacy of the white race should seriously be called into question.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Lyndon said...
    ...we honkies are at the top of the power structure.

    Please, honky...

    The first two words of the Lord's Prayer are, "Our Father". We are created equal in His eye's. If you feel or act 'less than or more than', you are blaspheming all Christian (and most other) teachings.

    And, oh yeah, what that little diddy - "We, The People". I'm one of the We's and so are you.

    ReplyDelete
  8. two reactions: he's FUCKING NUTS.

    second: is "militate" a word?

    ReplyDelete
  9. An important question, was it the classic version or the Jim Carrey version that Auster was reacting to. If it's the Carrey version, I think preventing our children from watching it might be for the greater good, albeit for reasons different from Auster.

    Secondly, if it's the classic version, are we to believe that Auster had never heard of the story until this year? He's acting like he's made a new discovery or something.

    ReplyDelete
  10. So it's just a-ok to be violated by a white? More power to you for reading his blog. I can read the Right but this guy represent an extreme that need not be living.

    ReplyDelete
  11. If it's the Carrey version, I think preventing our children from watching it might be for the greater good, albeit for reasons different from Auster.

    You're right, Andrew. A good outcome is a good outcome.

    The Carrey version of "Grinch" was last night's ABC Movie of the Week.

    ReplyDelete
  12. That's hilarious.

    It seems that he's completely lost his grip on reality.

    I imagine him as this lonely, crazy man typing feverishly at his computer, hair awry, eyes burning with feverish passion, as his TV blares in the background.

    A fire burns in the hearth, his glass of Metamucil gels on the desk beside him...and inside his chest beats a teeny, tiny heart

    ...that will never ever grow any bigger because he's trapped in his bizarre worldview, a perceptual reality that becomes more and more marginalized as the world changes and leaves him and his ilk behind.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Brahahaha! Oh man... subversive film-making certainly isn't fiction, but these people are ridiculous.

    Can one still say "these people" without retribution?

    Fear-induced paranoia! Obama and his socialist liberal army are comin' ta getcha!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Give me a break!

    First of all, How The Grinch Stole Christmas is about anti-materialism. I don't know what post-modern butchery the Jim Carrey version features and I don't know if it turns the Grinch into a 'racial-alien' or what have you. But duh. Its a childrens book. The only thing that makes the Grinch different is that he hates xmas and then learns to love it when he sees that it came without ribbons, tags, packages boxes or bags! Can you even get more traditionally Christian than that?

    And yes, I know the Grinch by heart, who doesnt?

    ReplyDelete
  15. it's funny how almost EVERYTHING has the ability to go back to the issue of race, bias or not even if it is a children's story

    but i remember reading about how shrek is like the black man being that he enjoys living on his swamp (ghetto) alone and does not want any intruders violating his space. i need to read that again because my mind was not equipped for that kind of analysis

    ps- i nominated you for the Superior Scribbler Award

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yeah, right. The main people raping and murdering young white girls are "racial aliens"... Not white pedophiles like Josef Fritzl, Peter Tobin, michael Mullen... et al ad infinitum. Racists are so consumed by their prejudice that they throw logic and evidence out of the window.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Awesome. Maybe LA's good buddy David Horowitz should add Grinch-cegenation to his list of liberal propaganda being taught in our universities.

    ReplyDelete
  18. What Auster needs for Christmas is a copy of Enemy Mine.

    ReplyDelete